SGU Episode 72: Difference between revisions
(Add timestamps and Randi Speaks) |
m (a quick skeleton addition; needs news shownotes and better formatted emails skeletons) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Episode|{{CURRENTMONTH}}|{{CURRENTDAY}}|{{CURRENTYEAR}}}}<!-- | |||
** Use {{Episode|M|D|YYYY}} for the outline. This will generate a green message box asking for help with transcribing the episode. | |||
*** *** *** Use {{900s|NNN|episodebox}}, where 'NNN' is the episode number, to generate the message box without having to add the specific M/D/YYYY inputs. | |||
** If you intend to transcribe the _whole_ episode, please _REPLACE_ the "Episode" or "900s" template above with the "transcribing all" template: | |||
{{transcribing all | |||
|date = YYYY-MM-DD | |||
|transcriber = (optional) | |||
|time = (optional; use HHMM (Enter the 24-hour time in GMT) ) | |||
|}} | |||
** If you _only_ want to work on a section, just add the "transcribing section" template BELOW the "Episode" or "900s" template above to indicate you are not working on the entire transcription: | |||
{{transcribing section | |||
|date = YYYY-MM-DD | |||
|transcriber = (optional) | |||
|time = (optional; use HHMM (Enter the 24-hour time in GMT) ) | |||
|}} | |||
** If you use the "transcribing section" template (placing it here, at the top of the transcript under the "Episode"/"900s" template), make sure you _also_ have a "transcribing" template above whichever section you're currently working on: | |||
{{transcribing | |||
|date = YYYY-MM-DD | |||
|transcriber = (optional) | |||
|time = (optional; use HHMM (Enter the 24-hour time in GMT) ) | |||
|}} | |||
** *** Once transcription is complete, please delete this entire "Episode" markup section! *** | |||
--> | |||
{{Editing required | {{Editing required | ||
|transcription | |transcription = y | ||
<!-- | | |proofreading = <!-- please only activate when some transcription is present. --> | ||
|formatting | |time-stamps = y <!-- delete when all time-stamps have been added --> | ||
|links | |formatting = y | ||
|Today I Learned list | |links = y | ||
|categories | |Today I Learned list = y | ||
|segment redirects | |categories = y <!-- try to avoid assigning categories to whole episodes; redirect pages should be categorized for clearer links to categories... delete this line when all sections have been categorized --> | ||
|segment redirects = y <!-- redirect pages for segments with head-line type titles --> | |||
|}} | |}} | ||
{{ThisOutline}} <!-- Remove when all the episode's segments are outlined --> | |||
{{UseOutline}} <!-- Remove when human transcription is complete --> | |||
{{InfoBox | {{InfoBox | ||
|episodeNum = 72 | |episodeNum = 72 | ||
|episodeDate = December 6<sup>th</sup> 2006 | |episodeDate = December 6<sup>th</sup> 2006 | ||
|episodeIcon = File:Orionlunarorbitsmall.jpg | |episodeIcon = File:Orionlunarorbitsmall.jpg | ||
|caption = [[Special:NewFiles|Click for the gallery of uploaded files]]<br>Add an appropriate caption here for the episode icon | |||
<!-- | |||
Clear this above parameter to add your caption. You can use [_link_URL_ _caption_or_short_blurb_for_link_text_] to make all or part of the caption have a weblink. Alternatively, replace this parameter with the one below for a caption for a "hidden" image; note that you can't put a weblink inside the transclusion [[ ]], so you'd have to make a separate part of the caption be the text for a URL. You could use a <ref> reference_here </ref> tag instead, of course. | |||
--> | |||
|verified = <!-- leave blank until verified, then put a 'y'--> | |||
|rebecca = y | |rebecca = y | ||
|bob = y | |bob = y | ||
| Line 18: | Line 61: | ||
|guest1 = KM: Ken MacLeod | |guest1 = KM: Ken MacLeod | ||
|downloadLink = http://media.libsyn.com/media/skepticsguide/skepticast2006-12-06.mp3 | |downloadLink = http://media.libsyn.com/media/skepticsguide/skepticast2006-12-06.mp3 | ||
|forumLink = | |forumLink = https://sguforums.org/index.php?topic=769 | ||
|qowText = What we observe is not nature itself, but nature exposed to our method of questioning. | |qowText = What we observe is not nature itself, but nature exposed to our method of questioning. | ||
|qowAuthor = {{w|Werner Heisenberg}} | |qowAuthor = {{w|Werner Heisenberg}} | ||
| Line 26: | Line 69: | ||
== Introduction == | == Introduction == | ||
''You're listening to the Skeptics' Guide to the Universe, your escape to reality.'' | ''You're listening to the Skeptics' Guide to the Universe, your escape to reality.'' | ||
== News Items == | == News Items == | ||
=== Holiday Shopping Scams <small>(1:00)</small> === | === Holiday Shopping Scams <small>(1:00)</small> === | ||
* Be skeptical when shopping online | * Be skeptical when shopping online | ||
| Line 57: | Line 100: | ||
=== Testing ID <small>(51:26)</small> === | === Testing ID <small>(51:26)</small> === | ||
<blockquote>Hi guys (guys is non-gender specific in England)<br/><br/>Love the podcast. I've nearly caught up with you now, I'm just on the October shows. It's nice to be able to listen to voices of sanity in what can seem a pretty insane world.<br/><br/>I have a question - more of a challenge - for you.<br/><br/>I know ID is not a science, and the actual answer is 'you can't' but I'd like to hear you guys trying to design some experiments for a science class on Intelligent Design.<br/><br/>The issue is raising its head over here (only in a small way though) and I thought it might be fun to have a bit of ammunition.<br/><br/>John Ansari (pronounced AN-SAAR-EE)<br/>UK</blockquote> | <blockquote>Hi guys (guys is non-gender specific in England)<br/><br/>Love the podcast. I've nearly caught up with you now, I'm just on the October shows. It's nice to be able to listen to voices of sanity in what can seem a pretty insane world.<br/><br/>I have a question - more of a challenge - for you.<br/><br/>I know ID is not a science, and the actual answer is 'you can't' but I'd like to hear you guys trying to design some experiments for a science class on Intelligent Design.<br/><br/>The issue is raising its head over here (only in a small way though) and I thought it might be fun to have a bit of ammunition.<br/><br/>John Ansari (pronounced AN-SAAR-EE)<br/>UK</blockquote> | ||
== Randi Speaks <small>(58:02)</small> == | == Randi Speaks <small>(58:02)</small> == | ||
* The Uncompromising Observations of a Veteran Skeptic<br/><br/>Each week James Randi gives a skeptical commentary in his own unique style.<br/><br/>This week's topic: Will they ever learn? The end of the world and other nonsense.<br/> | * The Uncompromising Observations of a Veteran Skeptic<br/><br/>Each week James Randi gives a skeptical commentary in his own unique style.<br/><br/>This week's topic: Will they ever learn? The end of the world and other nonsense.<br/> | ||
| Line 66: | Line 110: | ||
== Science or Fiction <small>(1:03:04)</small> == | == Science or Fiction <small>(1:03:04)</small> == | ||
<!-- | |||
** begin transcription below the following templates, including host reading the items ** | |||
--> | |||
{{Page categories | |||
|SoF with a Theme = <!-- | |||
search for "THEME (NNNN SoF)" to create a redirect page, where "NNNN" is the episode number, then edit that page with: | |||
#REDIRECT | |||
[[SGU_Episode_NNNN#theme]] | |||
[[Category:SoF with a Theme]] | |||
Instead of adding an entire episode to a category, once redirects have been created, we suggest typing "redirect(s) created for" in front of the text you hide in the markup that follows the category name, seen in the "page categories" template above --> | |||
}} | |||
{{SOFinfo | |||
|theme = <!-- delete or leave blank if no theme --> | |||
|item1 = New study suggests that homo sapiens innovated male/female division of labor and this gave them a critical advantage over Neandertals. | |||
|link1web = url_from_SoF_show_notes <!-- delete or leave blank if none --> | |||
|link1title = _article_title_ <!-- delete or leave blank if none --> | |||
|link1pub = _publication_ <!-- delete or leave blank if none --> | |||
|item2 = Newly published study has linked frequent cell phone use to declining cognitive function, as measured by standard IQ. | |||
|link2web = url_from_SoF_show_notes <!-- delete or leave blank if none --> | |||
|link2title = _article_title_ <!-- delete or leave blank if none --> | |||
|link2pub = _publication_ <!-- delete or leave blank if none --> | |||
|item3 = New research shows that the effectiveness of advertising has nothing to do with the actual message they contain. | |||
|link3web = url_from_SoF_show_notes <!-- delete or leave blank if none --> | |||
|link3title = _article_title_ <!-- delete or leave blank if none --> | |||
|link3pub = _publication_ <!-- delete or leave blank if none --> | |||
|}} | |||
{{SOFResults | |||
|fiction = <!-- short word or phrase representing the item --> | |||
|fiction2 = <!-- delete or leave blank if absent; rarely does a host amend a "science" item --> | |||
<!-- | |||
** Very rarely the game is flipped into two or more fiction items and one science item. If so, change the template title from {{SOFResults to {{FOSResults .. see Episode 903 | |||
--> | |||
|science1 = <!-- short word or phrase representing the item --> | |||
|science2 = <!-- delete or leave blank if absent --> | |||
|science3 = <!-- delete or leave blank if absent --> | |||
|rogue1 = <!-- rogues in order of response --> | |||
|answer1 = <!-- item guessed, using word or phrase from above --> | |||
|rogue2 = | |||
|answer2 = | |||
|rogue3 = | |||
|answer3 = | |||
|rogue4 = <!-- delete or leave blank if absent --> | |||
|answer4 = <!-- delete or leave blank if absent --> | |||
|host =steve <!-- asker of the questions; change name if other than steve --> | |||
<!-- for the result options below, | |||
only put a 'y' next to one. --> | |||
|sweep = <!-- all the Rogues guessed wrong --> | |||
|clever = <!-- each item was guessed (Steve's preferred result) --> | |||
|win = <!-- at least one Rogue guessed wrong, but not them all --> | |||
|swept = <!-- all the Rogues guessed right --> | |||
}} | |||
''Voice-over: It's time for Science or Fiction.'' | |||
<!-- | |||
** START SECTION TRANSCRIPTION HERE ** | |||
--> | |||
== Skeptical Puzzle <small>(1:12:30)</small> == | == Skeptical Puzzle <small>(1:12:30)</small> == | ||
<blockquote>Last Week's puzzle<br/>This person had good motives in mind when he proposed that mans activities occur in predictable waves. He took stock in this belief, and in his own bullish way, brought his philosophy to bear. Perhaps he should have invested more time in his research, for he could have used some corrections to realize his theory would crash.<br/><br/>Who is this person?<br/><br/>Ralph Nelson Elliot<br/>Winner: John Maddox<br/><br/><br/>This Week's puzzle<br/>Take a mylar coat.<br/>Put it in a machine and mix it up.<br/>Lay it out.<br/><br/>What's left is something that was once believed to exist, yet has never been found.<br/><br/>What is it?<br/></blockquote> | <blockquote>Last Week's puzzle<br/>This person had good motives in mind when he proposed that mans activities occur in predictable waves. He took stock in this belief, and in his own bullish way, brought his philosophy to bear. Perhaps he should have invested more time in his research, for he could have used some corrections to realize his theory would crash.<br/><br/>Who is this person?<br/><br/>Ralph Nelson Elliot<br/>Winner: John Maddox<br/><br/><br/>This Week's puzzle<br/>Take a mylar coat.<br/>Put it in a machine and mix it up.<br/>Lay it out.<br/><br/>What's left is something that was once believed to exist, yet has never been found.<br/><br/>What is it?<br/></blockquote> | ||
== Quote of the Week <small>(1:13:50)</small> == | |||
< | === _Rogue_'s Response === | ||
=== _Rogue_'s Response === | |||
=== _Rogue_'s Response === | |||
=== _Rogue_'s Response === | |||
=== Steve Explains Item #_n_ === | |||
=== Steve Explains Item #_n_ === | |||
=== Steve Explains Item #_n_ === | |||
{{anchor|qow}} <!-- leave anchor(s) directly above the corresponding section that follows --> | |||
== Skeptical Quote of the Week <small>(1:13:50)</small> == | |||
<!-- | |||
** For when the quote is read aloud, use quotation marks for when the Rogue actually reads it. | |||
--> | |||
{{qow | |||
|text = What we observe is not nature itself, but nature exposed to our method of questioning. | |||
|author = {{w|Werner Heisenberg}} | |||
|lived = 1901-1976 | |||
|desc = German theoretical physicist | |||
}} | |||
<!-- | |||
** START SECTION TRANSCRIPTION HERE ** | |||
--> | |||
{{Outro61}} | {{Outro61}} | ||
| Line 78: | Line 216: | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
{{Navigation}} | == Today I Learned == | ||
* Fact/Description, possibly with an article reference<ref>[url_for_TIL publication: title]</ref> <!-- add this format to include a referenced article, maintaining spaces: <ref>[URL publication: title]</ref> --> | |||
* Fact/Description | |||
* Fact/Description | |||
<!-- ( *** delete this parenthetical and the preceding markup wiki code to display the Notes section *** ) | |||
== Notes == | |||
<references group=note/> <!-- | |||
** To create a note, type <ref group=note> then add the TEXT, LINK, etc. </ref> after the relevant text, or after the punctuation mark if the text to be noted is at the end of a sentence. | |||
--> | |||
== References == | |||
<references/> | |||
<!-- ( *** delete this parenthetical and the preceding markup wiki code to use the Vocabulary ref group *** ) | |||
=== Vocabulary === | |||
<references group=v/> <!-- | |||
** To tag a vocab word in your transcription, type <ref group=v>[https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/WORD Wiktionary: WORD]</ref> after the word, or after the punctuation mark if the vocab word is the last word in a sentence. | |||
--> | |||
{{Navigation}} <!-- inserts images that link to the previous and next episode pages --> | |||
{{Page categories <!-- it helps to write a short description with the (episode number) which can then be used to search for the [Short description (NNNN)]s to create pages for redirects. | |||
Instead of adding an entire episode to a category, once redirects have been created, we suggest typing "redirect(s) created for" in front of the text you hide in the markup that follows the category name, seen in this "page categories" template. Make sure the redirect has the appropriate categories. As an example, the redirect "Eugenie Scott interview: Evolution Denial Survey (842)" is categorized into | |||
[[Category:Interview]] and [[Category:Nature & Evolution]] --> | |||
|Guest Rogues = <!-- search for NAME (NNNN) to create a redirect page --> | |||
<!-- also note, not all guests are guest rogues; interviewees who don't feature beyond the interview are just guests --> | |||
|Live Recording = <!-- search for LOCATION/EVENT YYYY (NNNN) to create a redirect page, then edit that page with: | |||
#REDIRECT | |||
[[SGU_Episode_NNNN]] | |||
[[Category:Live Recording]] --> | |||
|Alternative Medicine = | |||
|Astronomy & Space Science = | |||
|Cons, Scams & Hoaxes = | |||
|Conspiracy Theories = | |||
|Creationism & ID = | |||
|Cryptozoology = | |||
|Energy Healing = | |||
|Entertainment = | |||
|ESP = | |||
|General Science = | |||
|Ghosts & Demons = | |||
|History = | |||
|Homeopathy = | |||
|Humor = | |||
|Legal Issues & Regulations = | |||
|Logic & Philosophy = | |||
|Myths & Misconceptions = | |||
|Nature & Evolution = | |||
|Neuroscience & Psychology = | |||
|New Age = | |||
|Paranormal = | |||
|Physics & Mechanics = | |||
|Politics = | |||
|Prophecy = | |||
|Pseudoscience = | |||
|Religion & Faith = | |||
|Science & Education = | |||
|Science & Medicine = | |||
|Science & the Media = | |||
|SGU = | |||
|Technology = | |||
|UFOs & Aliens = | |||
|Amendments = | |||
|Forgotten Superheroes of Science = | |||
|This Day in Skepticism = | |||
|Women in History = | |||
|Year in Review = | |||
|Other = | |||
|Randi Speaks = | |||
|Skeptical Puzzle = | |||
}} | |||
Revision as of 00:21, 27 November 2023
|
This transcript outline is for an upcoming episode. Please help us complete the transcript once the episode is released. Remember to add a Transcribing template to the top of this transcript before you start so that we don't duplicate your efforts. |
|
This episode needs: transcription, time stamps, formatting, links, 'Today I Learned' list, categories, segment redirects. Please help out by contributing! |
How to Contribute |
This is an outline for a typical episode's transcription. Not all of these segments feature in each episode.
There may also be additional/special segments not listed in this outline.
You can use this outline to help structure the transcription. Click "Edit" above to begin.
| SGU Episode 72 |
|---|
| December 6th 2006 |
 |
Click for the gallery of uploaded files |
| Skeptical Rogues |
| S: Steven Novella |
B: Bob Novella |
R: Rebecca Watson |
J: Jay Novella |
E: Evan Bernstein |
| Guest |
KM: Ken MacLeod |
| Quote of the Week |
What we observe is not nature itself, but nature exposed to our method of questioning. |
| Links |
| Download Podcast |
| Show Notes |
| Forum Discussion |
Introduction
You're listening to the Skeptics' Guide to the Universe, your escape to reality.
News Items
Holiday Shopping Scams (1:00)
- Be skeptical when shopping online
NASA Plans Moon Base (9:54)
- www.space.com/news/050919_nasa_moon.html
Hawking article on people leaving the Earth:
www.infowars.com/articles/science/hawking_man_must_leave_planet_earth.htm
Flowing water on Mars? (14:36)
- www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/mars/news/mgs-20061206.html
Molecular Manufacturing (23:16)
- National Academies Releases Report on Molecular Manufacturing www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=232
K-T Extinction Events (26:03)
Interview with Ken Macleod (27:12)
- Dr. MaCleod is the lead author on a new article favoring the single-impact theory of the K-T extinction event that killed the dinosaurs 65 million years ago.
rcp.missouri.edu/articles/macleod-dinosaurextinction.html
Dr. MaCleod's Homepage: rcp.missouri.edu/geosci_macleod/index.html
Questions and E-mails
Hi from Down Under (38:14)
Hey people
How I love to hear the new episodes of your show. Just the thing to listen to while walking through the streets of Sydney. I have recorded a short greeting and a question for you (attached). Maybe you can be a guest on my podcast sometime?
Wishing you well and another year of podcasting.
Richard Saunders
Producer of the TANK podcast
Home Page
www.MysteryInvestigators.com/richard
Investigator / Editor / Film Maker
www.MysteryInvestigators.com
Australian Skeptics Inc
www.skeptics.com.au
Chiropractic HIV Denial (40:44)
Hi,
As always, I really enjoy your show. I am a former chiropractor, now skeptic, who listens every week.
The reason I am writing you is because I found a great article (or series of articles, rather) that you can possibly discuss on your show. I'm not sure if you have ever done a program on people who deny that HIV is the cause of AIDS, but recently there was a THREE PART interview in 'Today's Chiropractic Lifestyle' magazine promoting this theory. Here are the links:
www.todayschiropractic.com/issues/2006/oct_nov/bull.html
www.todayschiropractic.com/issues/2006/oct_nov/bull_02.html
www.todayschiropractic.com/issues/2006/oct_nov/bull_03.html
'Today's Chiropractic Lifestyle' is published by Life University in Marietta, Georgia. It is where I attended chiropractic college. While at chiro college, I was misinformed about almost every public health topic you can imagine. This article above is a good example of chiropractic misinformation and seems to contain almost every 'HIV denialist' argument available today.
I am happy to no longer be a quack and enjoy learning about science and reality from your podcast. Keep up the good work!
Jeff Jones, D.C. (Life University class of 2001)
Tokyo, Japan
High Tech Dowsing (45:38)
I have begun listening to your show very recently, and I'm trying to catch up on them.
Tell Rebecca Watson that I got her skepchicks calendar yesterday, and after paging through it, I'm satisfied in a great investment.
Anyway, on to the secondary reason for this message.
I'd like you to take a look at this, and maybe see if there's more information about this out there: http://www.carteblanche.co.za/Display/Display.asp?Id=3233
There was another article, published over a year ago: http://www.sabcnews.com/south_africa/general/0,2172,93664,00.html
To me, it sounds like some kind of futuristic method of dowsing. The only positive results I've heard about this is from the articles, and they are obviously anecdotal. If the only evidence that it works is anecdotal evidence, should it be discounted? Is it too early to dismiss this, or should we give them time to come up with actual experimental data?
Thanks for your time,
Matt Frederickson
South Dakota, USA
Testing ID (51:26)
Hi guys (guys is non-gender specific in England)
Love the podcast. I've nearly caught up with you now, I'm just on the October shows. It's nice to be able to listen to voices of sanity in what can seem a pretty insane world.
I have a question - more of a challenge - for you.
I know ID is not a science, and the actual answer is 'you can't' but I'd like to hear you guys trying to design some experiments for a science class on Intelligent Design.
The issue is raising its head over here (only in a small way though) and I thought it might be fun to have a bit of ammunition.
John Ansari (pronounced AN-SAAR-EE)
UK
Randi Speaks (58:02)
- The Uncompromising Observations of a Veteran Skeptic
Each week James Randi gives a skeptical commentary in his own unique style.
This week's topic: Will they ever learn? The end of the world and other nonsense.
JR: Hello, this is James Randi. My question for this week is rather simple: Doesn't anyone ever learn? I refer to the fact that prophets are always predicting the end of the world, and have been doing it for generations now. So far as I've been able to ascertain, the end of the world has not arrived. Now I do live in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, where not every item shows up in the local papers or on TV, but you'd think that there might be some sort of a mention of it if the world were to come to an end and that I would therefore see it. But hey, it just didn't happen. The prophets continue. All over the world, they are predicting the end of the world next Thursday or next month or whatever. And they won't tire of doing that, simply because the media will cluster around them, give them time and space on television, on radio, and in printed articles as well, if they make a sufficiently silly claim. That's the way the media works.
Now I'm sure you all remember the famous alien autopsy that came up a few years ago. Garish films were shown in black and white, of course, made apparently by an 8mm camera, of this dreadful operation taking place on a poor alien figure sitting on the table. It got a lot of attention, and it made a lot of money for the people that supplied the film. It was on every newscast for quite some period of time. When, eventually, that bubble burst, what was the reaction of the media? Typical. You see, what they did was mention that it had turned out to be a hoax, and then they forgot about it entirely, apparently ready for the next similar hoax to come along. Just look at our favorite, quote, "psychic", unquote, Sylvia Browne. Now it's pretty evident that Montel Williams, who dotes on this woman's attention on his program, knows what she's really doing. Williams is a very well-educated man. Look up the records sometime. And he's smart enough, too, to know the techniques that she's using. He sees how often she's wrong. But the point is he simply doesn't care, because she gets him sponsor satisfaction. That's the bottom line. With that sort of media responsibility working for her, she can go on forever, no matter how wrong she is.
Another one of my favorite hoaxes is the perpetual motion machines. These things are being invented every ten minutes, it seems, all over the world. Not only that, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office will issue a patent on them very easily. But think of it. If there were a perpetual motion machine or a free-energy machine (either will do), that would be such a huge step forward in technology and in the scientific and technological outlook, wouldn't it? So where do we find one, uno, einz, une, one of these machines that has been set in operation and actually can be demonstrated? They simply aren't there, friends. But that will never stop millionaires from investing in them, and some people taking their hard-earned cash and investing it in stock companies that sell that kind of product. No, we just don't learn. Now I remember when I was a kid up in Toronto, Canada, the Great Pyramid was supposed to have all the secrets of the universe in it. It was supposed to have prophecies that went hundreds of years ahead and showed the future of mankind. Oh, really? Well, now, let's count the number of prophecies that have come true that are supposed to be shown in the Great Pyramid. Let me see. Gee, zero. That's not a very large number, friends. But the pyramid nuts are still out there. They'll still preach this nonsense to anyone who will listen, and to some who won't. A few days ago, I had some Jehovah's Witnesses call by my home in Plantation, Florida. Well-meaning folks, I'm sure, but simply wrong. The one thing they don't want to discuss is their prophecies and whether or not they've come true. You see, they get the same count as the pyramidologists do, zero. Ah well. This is James Randi.
Science or Fiction (1:03:04)
Item #1: New study suggests that homo sapiens innovated male/female division of labor and this gave them a critical advantage over Neandertals.[1]
Item #2: Newly published study has linked frequent cell phone use to declining cognitive function, as measured by standard IQ.[2]
Item #3: New research shows that the effectiveness of advertising has nothing to do with the actual message they contain.[3]
| Answer | Item |
|---|---|
| Fiction | |
| Science |
| Host | Result |
|---|---|
| Steve |
| Rogue | Guess |
|---|
Voice-over: It's time for Science or Fiction.
Skeptical Puzzle (1:12:30)
Last Week's puzzle
This person had good motives in mind when he proposed that mans activities occur in predictable waves. He took stock in this belief, and in his own bullish way, brought his philosophy to bear. Perhaps he should have invested more time in his research, for he could have used some corrections to realize his theory would crash.
Who is this person?
Ralph Nelson Elliot
Winner: John Maddox
This Week's puzzle
Take a mylar coat.
Put it in a machine and mix it up.
Lay it out.
What's left is something that was once believed to exist, yet has never been found.
What is it?
_Rogue_'s Response
_Rogue_'s Response
_Rogue_'s Response
_Rogue_'s Response
Steve Explains Item #_n_
Steve Explains Item #_n_
Steve Explains Item #_n_
Skeptical Quote of the Week (1:13:50)
What we observe is not nature itself, but nature exposed to our method of questioning.
– Werner Heisenberg (1901-1976), German theoretical physicist
S: The Skeptics' Guide to the Universe is produced by the New England Skeptical Society in association with the James Randi Educational Foundation. For more information on this and other episodes, please visit our website at www.theskepticsguide.org. Please send us your questions, suggestions, and other feedback; you can use the "Contact Us" page on our website, or you can send us an email to info@theskepticsguide.org'. 'Theorem' is produced by Kineto and is used with permission.
References
Today I Learned
- Fact/Description, possibly with an article reference[1]
- Fact/Description
- Fact/Description
References
- ↑ [url_for_TIL publication: title]
|
|
|