SGU Episode 747: Difference between revisions

From SGUTranscripts
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (saving my work)
m (removed w/ links)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 16: Line 16:


If you use the "transcribing section" template at the top of "your" transcript, make sure you have a {{transcribing}} template above whichever section you’re currently working on -->  
If you use the "transcribing section" template at the top of "your" transcript, make sure you have a {{transcribing}} template above whichever section you’re currently working on -->  
{{Editing required (w/links)
{{Editing required
|transcription = y
|transcription = y
|proof-reading = <!-- please only include when some transcription is present. -->
|proof-reading = <!-- please only include when some transcription is present. -->
Line 40: Line 40:
|guest3 = <!-- leave blank if no third guest -->
|guest3 = <!-- leave blank if no third guest -->
|qowText = Time and again, science has shown that methodological naturalism can push back ignorance, finding increasingly detailed and informative answers to mysteries that once seemed impenetrable: the nature of light, the causes of disease, how the brain works. Evolution is doing the same with the riddle of how the living world took shape. Creationism, by any name, adds nothing of intellectual value to the effort.
|qowText = Time and again, science has shown that methodological naturalism can push back ignorance, finding increasingly detailed and informative answers to mysteries that once seemed impenetrable: the nature of light, the causes of disease, how the brain works. Evolution is doing the same with the riddle of how the living world took shape. Creationism, by any name, adds nothing of intellectual value to the effort.
|qowAuthor = {{John Rennie (editor)|John Rennie}}, American science writer
|qowAuthor = {{w|John Rennie (editor)|John Rennie}}, American science writer


|downloadLink = {{DownloadLink|2019-11-02}}
|downloadLink = {{DownloadLink|2019-11-02}}
Line 67: Line 67:


'''E:''' Good evening folks! ''(applause)''-->  
'''E:''' Good evening folks! ''(applause)''-->  
== This Day in Skepticism <small>()</small> ==
== Forgotten Superheroes of Science <small>()</small> ==
== "5 to 10 Years" <small>()</small> ==
== What’s the Word? <small>()</small> ==
* Word/Topic/Concept<ref group="v">[https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/WORD Wiktionary: WORD]</ref> <!-- we recommend also putting an in-line link to the Wikipedia or Wiktionary entry in addition to the Wiktionary vocab group reference. So, after the bullet, put either {{w|word/topic/concept}} or [https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/WORD WORD] -->
<blockquote> _consider_using_block_quotes_for_emails_read_aloud_in_this_segment_ </blockquote>
== Your Number’s Up <small>()</small> ==
== Name That Logical Fallacy <small>()</small> ==


== News Items ==
== News Items ==
Line 101: Line 86:
[inaudible]
[inaudible]


=== News_Item_1 <small>()</small> ===
=== Starship <small>()</small> ===
* [link_URL publication: title]<ref>[url_from_news_item_show_notes publication: title]</ref>
* [https://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/musk-wants-the-moon-by-2022/ Neurologica: Musk Wants the Moon by 2022]<ref>[https://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/musk-wants-the-moon-by-2022/ Neurologica: Musk Wants the Moon by 2022]</ref>
==== Sub_section_1 <small>()</small> ====


=== News_Item_2 <small>()</small> ===
=== New Class of Black Holes <small>()</small> ===
* [link_URL publication: title]<ref>[url_from_news_item_show_notes publication: title]</ref>
* [https://phys.org/news/2019-10-scientists-class-black-holes.html Phys.org: Scientists may have discovered whole new class of black holes]<ref>[https://phys.org/news/2019-10-scientists-class-black-holes.html Phys.org: Scientists may have discovered whole new class of black holes]</ref>


=== News_Item_3 <small>()</small> ===
=== Organic Farming <small>()</small> ===
* [link_URL publication: title]<ref>[url_from_news_item_show_notes publication: title]</ref>
* [https://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/another-damning-organic-study/ Neurologica: Another Damning Organic Study]<ref>[https://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/another-damning-organic-study/ Neurologica: Another Damning Organic Study]</ref>


=== News_Item_4 <small>()</small> ===
=== Golden Rice <small>()</small> ===
* [link_URL publication: title]<ref>[url_from_news_item_show_notes publication: title]</ref>
* [https://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/the-golden-rice-saga/ Neurologica: The Golden Rice Saga]<ref>[https://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/the-golden-rice-saga/ Neurologica: The Golden Rice Saga]</ref>


=== News_Item_5 <small>()</small> ===
=== Craniometry <small>()</small> ===
* [link_URL publication: title]<ref>[url_from_news_item_show_notes publication: title]</ref>
* [https://www.newstatesman.com/science-tech/technology/2019/10/disturbing-junk-science-craniometry-enjoying-resurgence NewStatesman: The disturbing junk science of craniometry is enjoying a resurgence]<ref>[https://www.newstatesman.com/science-tech/technology/2019/10/disturbing-junk-science-craniometry-enjoying-resurgence NewStatesman: The disturbing junk science of craniometry is enjoying a resurgence]</ref>
 
== Interview with ___ <small>()</small> ==
 
== Skeptical Puzzle <small>()</small> ==
* Answer to last week’s Puzzle: _brief_description_perhaps_with_link_
 
=== New Puzzle <small>()</small> ===


== Who's That Noisy? <small>()</small> ==
== Who's That Noisy? <small>()</small> ==
Line 133: Line 109:
== Questions/Emails/Corrections/Follow-ups <small>()</small> ==
== Questions/Emails/Corrections/Follow-ups <small>()</small> ==


<blockquote><p style="line-height:115%"> _consider_using_block_quotes_for_emails_read_aloud_in_this_segment_ with_reduced_spacing_for_long_chunks </p></blockquote>
=== Question #1: Hydrogen Scam <small>()</small> ===


=== Question/Email/Correction #1: _brief_description_ <small>()</small> ===
<blockquote><p style="line-height:120%"> Love your show. Member for several years. Not sure if you have followed Joi Scientific and their claim for a unique hydrogen from seawater technology. Just wanted to let you know that I was approached indirectly to help them with business matters several years ago and on looking into it I discovered every single red flag I had learned from the SGU. Seriously: all the red flags, even including investment by famous rich people. With the voice of SGU whispering in my ear, I called BS and said there was zero chance of Joi Scientific somehow reinventing physics and delivering the hydrogen economy perfectly formed. Two years and many millions of dollars later they have admitted that their claim of 200% efficiency was based on faulty measurement, so they are now seeking additional funding for research centered around "their improved understanding of the technology." So the scam goes on. I would love to hear your take on Joi Scientific if you're ever looking for a textbook case of pseudoscience in the critical field of energy and resources. Thanks and regards, <br>– Dan, Japan</p></blockquote>


=== Question/Email/Correction #2: _brief_description_ <small>()</small> ===  
=== Question #2: Solar Minimum <small>()</small> ===  


<blockquote><p style="line-height:120%"> Hi, I've seen a lot of online chat about an imminent solar minimum, possibly even a grand solar minimum, tied to this lots of wild predictions of famine, etc. I've found it surprisingly hard to find a decent source on this topic. NASA seem quite calm about it though. It seems to have all the hallmarks of ill-informed fearmongering but I wondered if it's something you guys might cover at some point.<br>– Trevor</p></blockquote>
== Science or Fiction <small>()</small> ==
== Science or Fiction <small>()</small> ==
{{SOFResults
|fiction = DST car crashes<!-- short word or phrase representing the item -->
|fiction2 = <!-- leave blank if absent -->


''Voiceover: It's time for Science or Fiction.''
|science1 = first in ontario<!-- short word or phrase representing the item -->
|science2 = energy cost a wash<!-- leave blank if absent -->
|science3 = <!-- leave blank if absent -->


<blockquote>'''Theme: ___''' <!--  
|rogue1 = bob<!-- rogues in order of response -->
|answer1 = energy cost a wash<!-- item guessed, using word or phrase from above -->


if there is a theme, make sure you suggest a redirect title next to the "SoF with a theme" category in the category list at the end. If no theme, remove "Theme" and the <br> before "Item #1" 
|rogue2 =jay
|answer2 =DST car crashes


--><br>'''Item #1:''' ___<ref>[url_from_SoF_show_notes publication: title]</ref><br>'''Item #2:''' ___<ref>[url_from_SoF_show_notes publication: title]</ref><br>'''Item #3:''' ___<ref>[url_from_SoF_show_notes publication: title]</ref><br>'''Item #4:''' ___<ref>[url_from_SoF_show_notes publication: title]</ref></blockquote>
|rogue3 =evan
|answer3 =DST car crashes


<!-- short words/phrases representing the items:
|rogue4 = <!-- leave blank if absent -->
first in ontario
|answer4 = <!-- leave blank if absent -->
DST car crashes
energy cost a wash
-->
=== _Rogue_ Response ===


=== _Rogue_ Response ===
|rogue5 = <!-- leave blank if absent -->
|answer5 = <!-- leave blank if absent -->


=== _Rogue_ Response ===
|host = steve<!-- asker of the questions -->
<!-- for the result options below,
    only put a 'y' next to one. -->
|sweep = <!-- all the Rogues guessed wrong -->
|clever = <!-- each item was guessed (Steve's preferred result) -->
|win = y<!-- at least one Rogue guessed wrong, but not them all -->
|swept = <!-- all the Rogues guessed right -->
}}
''Voiceover: It's time for Science or Fiction.''


=== _Rogue_ Response ===
<blockquote>'''Theme: Daylight Savings Time'''<br>'''Item #1:''' The first use of Daylight Savings time was in Ontario, Canada, in 1908.<ref>[https://www.timeanddate.com/time/dst/history.html TimeAndDate.com: History of Daylight aving Time (DST)]</ref><br>'''Item #2:''' Researchers estimate that an extra 600 people die each year in the US due to car crashes because of the switch to DST.<ref>[https://pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/pdfplus/10.1257/app.20140100 American Economic Journal: Applied Economics: Spring Forward at Your Own Risk:  Daylight Saving Time and Fatal Vehicle Crashes]</ref><br>'''Item #3:''' Studies looking at energy cost of DST show it is basically a wash, with slight advantages or disadvantages depending on region.<ref>[https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/topics/reference/daylight-saving-time/ NatGeo: Why daylight saving time exists—and is so unpopular]</ref></blockquote>


=== _Host_ Explains Item #_n_ ===
=== Bob's Response ===


=== _Host_ Explains Item #_n_ ===
=== Jay's Response ===


=== _Host_ Explains Item #_n_ ===
=== Evan's Response ===


=== _Host_ Explains Item #_n_ ===
=== Steve Explains Item #1 ===


=== Results ===
=== Steve Explains Item #2 ===
{{SOFResults
|episodeNum=747
|fiction= DST car crashes<!--- short word or phrase representing the item --->


|rogue1= <!--- rogues in order of response --->
=== Steve Explains Item #3 ===
|answer1= <!--- short word or phrase representing the guess --->
 
|rogue2=
|answer2=
 
|rogue3=
|answer3=
 
|rogue4= <!-- delete/leave blank if absent -->
|answer4= <!-- delete/leave blank if absent -->
 
|rogue5= <!-- delete/leave blank if absent -->
|answer5= <!-- delete/leave blank if absent -->
 
|host= <!--- asker of the questions --->
<!-- for the result options below,
    only put a 'y' next to one. -->
|sweep= <!-- all the Rogues guessed wrong -->
|clever= <!-- each item was guessed (Steve's preferred result) -->
|win= <!-- at least one Rogue guessed wrong, but not them all -->
|swept= <!-- all the Rogues guessed right -->
 
|otheritem1= <!-- item not guessed, delete/leave blank if absent -->
|otheritem2= <!-- item not guessed, delete/leave blank if absent -->
|otheritem3= <!-- item not guessed, delete/leave blank if absent -->
}}


== Skeptical Quote of the Week <small>()</small> ==
== Skeptical Quote of the Week <small>()</small> ==
Line 207: Line 168:
<!-- For the quote display, use block quote with no marks around quote followed by a long dash and the speaker's name, possibly with a reference. For the QoW in the recording, use quotation marks for when the Rogue actually reads the quote. -->  
<!-- For the quote display, use block quote with no marks around quote followed by a long dash and the speaker's name, possibly with a reference. For the QoW in the recording, use quotation marks for when the Rogue actually reads the quote. -->  


<blockquote>Time and again, science has shown that methodological naturalism can push back ignorance, finding increasingly detailed and informative answers to mysteries that once seemed impenetrable: the nature of light, the causes of disease, how the brain works. Evolution is doing the same with the riddle of how the living world took shape. Creationism, by any name, adds nothing of intellectual value to the effort.<br>– {{John Rennie (editor)|John Rennie}}, American science writer</blockquote>
<blockquote>Time and again, science has shown that methodological naturalism can push back ignorance, finding increasingly detailed and informative answers to mysteries that once seemed impenetrable: the nature of light, the causes of disease, how the brain works. Evolution is doing the same with the riddle of how the living world took shape. Creationism, by any name, adds nothing of intellectual value to the effort.<br>– {{w|John Rennie (editor)|John Rennie}}, American science writer</blockquote>


== Signoff/Announcements <small>()</small> ==  
== Signoff/Announcements <small>()</small> ==  

Latest revision as of 12:19, 20 October 2023

You can use this outline to help structure the transcription. Click "Edit" above to begin.

  Emblem-pen-green.png This transcript is not finished. Please help us finish it!
Add a Transcribing template to the top of this transcript before you start so that we don't duplicate your efforts.
  Emblem-pen-orange.png This episode needs: transcription, time stamps, formatting, links, 'Today I Learned' list, categories, segment redirects.
Please help out by contributing! 		How to Contribute

SGU Episode 747
November 2nd 2019
SAMPLE icon.jpg
(brief caption for the episode icon)

SGU 746                      SGU 748

Skeptical Rogues
S: Steven Novella


Quote of the Week

Time and again, science has shown that methodological naturalism can push back ignorance, finding increasingly detailed and informative answers to mysteries that once seemed impenetrable: the nature of light, the causes of disease, how the brain works. Evolution is doing the same with the riddle of how the living world took shape. Creationism, by any name, adds nothing of intellectual value to the effort.

John Rennie, American science writer

Links
Download Podcast
Show Notes
Forum Discussion


Introduction[edit]

Voiceover: You're listening to the Skeptics' Guide to the Universe, your escape to reality.


News Items[edit]

S:

B:

C:

J:

E:

(laughs) (laughter) (applause) [inaudible]

Starship ()[edit]

New Class of Black Holes ()[edit]

Organic Farming ()[edit]

Golden Rice ()[edit]

Craniometry ()[edit]

Who's That Noisy? ()[edit]

  • Answer to last week’s Noisy: _brief_description_perhaps_with_link_

New Noisy ()[edit]

[_short_vague_description_of_Noisy]

Questions/Emails/Corrections/Follow-ups ()[edit]

Question #1: Hydrogen Scam ()[edit]

Love your show. Member for several years. Not sure if you have followed Joi Scientific and their claim for a unique hydrogen from seawater technology. Just wanted to let you know that I was approached indirectly to help them with business matters several years ago and on looking into it I discovered every single red flag I had learned from the SGU. Seriously: all the red flags, even including investment by famous rich people. With the voice of SGU whispering in my ear, I called BS and said there was zero chance of Joi Scientific somehow reinventing physics and delivering the hydrogen economy perfectly formed. Two years and many millions of dollars later they have admitted that their claim of 200% efficiency was based on faulty measurement, so they are now seeking additional funding for research centered around "their improved understanding of the technology." So the scam goes on. I would love to hear your take on Joi Scientific if you're ever looking for a textbook case of pseudoscience in the critical field of energy and resources. Thanks and regards,
– Dan, Japan

Question #2: Solar Minimum ()[edit]

Hi, I've seen a lot of online chat about an imminent solar minimum, possibly even a grand solar minimum, tied to this lots of wild predictions of famine, etc. I've found it surprisingly hard to find a decent source on this topic. NASA seem quite calm about it though. It seems to have all the hallmarks of ill-informed fearmongering but I wondered if it's something you guys might cover at some point.
– Trevor

Science or Fiction ()[edit]

Answer Item
Fiction DST car crashes
Science First in ontario
Science
Energy cost a wash
Host Result
Steve win
Rogue Guess
Bob
 Energy cost a wash
Jay
 DST car crashes
Evan
 DST car crashes

Voiceover: It's time for Science or Fiction.

Theme: Daylight Savings Time
Item #1: The first use of Daylight Savings time was in Ontario, Canada, in 1908.[6]
Item #2: Researchers estimate that an extra 600 people die each year in the US due to car crashes because of the switch to DST.[7]
Item #3: Studies looking at energy cost of DST show it is basically a wash, with slight advantages or disadvantages depending on region.[8]

Bob's Response[edit]

Jay's Response[edit]

Evan's Response[edit]

Steve Explains Item #1[edit]

Steve Explains Item #2[edit]

Steve Explains Item #3[edit]

Skeptical Quote of the Week ()[edit]

Time and again, science has shown that methodological naturalism can push back ignorance, finding increasingly detailed and informative answers to mysteries that once seemed impenetrable: the nature of light, the causes of disease, how the brain works. Evolution is doing the same with the riddle of how the living world took shape. Creationism, by any name, adds nothing of intellectual value to the effort.
– John Rennie, American science writer

Signoff/Announcements ()[edit]

S: —and until next week, this is your Skeptics' Guide to the Universe.

S: Skeptics' Guide to the Universe is produced by SGU Productions, dedicated to promoting science and critical thinking. For more information, visit us at theskepticsguide.org. Send your questions to info@theskepticsguide.org. And, if you would like to support the show and all the work that we do, go to patreon.com/SkepticsGuide and consider becoming a patron and becoming part of the SGU community. Our listeners and supporters are what make SGU possible.

[top]                        

Today I Learned[edit]

  • Fact/Description, possibly with an article reference[9]
  • Fact/Description
  • Fact/Description


References[edit]

  1. ↑ Neurologica: Musk Wants the Moon by 2022
  2. ↑ Phys.org: Scientists may have discovered whole new class of black holes
  3. ↑ Neurologica: Another Damning Organic Study
  4. ↑ Neurologica: The Golden Rice Saga
  5. ↑ NewStatesman: The disturbing junk science of craniometry is enjoying a resurgence
  6. ↑ TimeAndDate.com: History of Daylight aving Time (DST)
  7. ↑ American Economic Journal: Applied Economics: Spring Forward at Your Own Risk: Daylight Saving Time and Fatal Vehicle Crashes
  8. ↑ NatGeo: Why daylight saving time exists—and is so unpopular
  9. ↑ [url_for_TIL publication: title]

Vocabulary[edit]


Navi-previous.png Back to top of page Navi-next.png
Retrieved from "https://www.sgutranscripts.org/w/index.php?title=SGU_Episode_747&oldid=18658"