SGU Episode 50: Difference between revisions

From SGUTranscripts
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (adding most current skeleton to help maintain current formatting)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Editing required
{{Episode|7|5|2006}}<!--
|transcription         = y
 
<!-- |proof-reading         = y    please remove commenting mark-up when some transcription is present -->
** Use {{Episode|M|D|YYYY}} for the outline. This will generate a green message box asking for help with transcribing the episode.
|time-stamps           = y
 
|formatting             = y
** If you intend to transcribe the whole episode, please REPLACE the "Episode" template above with the "transcribing all" template:
|links                 = y
 
|Today I Learned list   = y
{{transcribing all
|categories             = y
|transcriber =
|segment redirects     = y     <!-- redirect pages for segments with head-line type titles -->
|date = YYYY-MM-DD
}}
 
** If you only want to work on a section, just add the "transcribing section" template BELOW the "Episode" template above to indicate you are not working on the entire transcription:
 
{{transcribing section
|transcriber =
|date = YYYY-MM-DD
}}
 
** If you use the "transcribing section" template (placing it here, at the top of the transcript under the "Episode" template), make sure you have a {{transcribing}} template above whichever section you're currently working on
 
** If you want to hide the "Editing Required" and "This Outline/Use Outline" message boxes, just put the < ! - - and - - > (no spaces) markup offset punctuation code before "Editing Required" and after the "Outline" templates. You will need to temporarily remove the - - > markup code in the markup text for them.
 
** Once transcription is complete, please delete this markup section!
-->
{{Editing required (w/links)
|transcription = y
|proof-reading = <!-- please only include when some transcription is present. -->
|time-stamps = y
|formatting = y
|links = y
|Today I Learned list = y
|categories = y
|segment redirects = y <!-- redirect pages for segments with head-line type titles -->
|}}
|}}
{{ThisOutline}} <!-- Remove this message if you've outlined all the episode's segments -->
{{UseOutline}} <!-- Remove when transcription is complete -->
{{InfoBox
{{InfoBox
|episodeNum     = 50
|episodeNum = 50
|episodeDate   = July 5<sup>th</sup> 2006 <!-- broadcast date -->
|episodeDate = {{month|7}} {{date|5}} 2006 <!-- broadcast date -->
|episodeIcon    = File:Posner2.jpg          <!-- use "File:" and file name for image on show notes page-->
|verified = <!-- leave blank until verified, then put a 'y'-->
|previous      =                          <!-- not required, automates to previous episode -->
|episodeIcon = File:Posner2.jpg
|next          =                       <!-- not required, automates to next episode -->
|bob =y
|rebecca        = y                         <!-- leave blank if absent -->
|rebecca = <!-- leave blank if absent -->
|bob            = y                        <!-- leave blank if absent -->
|jay =y
|jay           = y                         <!-- leave blank if absent -->
|evan =y
|evan           = y                         <!-- leave blank if absent -->
|perry =y
|perry         =                         <!-- leave blank if absent -->
|guest1 = <!-- ZZ: {{w|NAME}} or leave blank if no guest -->
|guest1         =     <!-- leave blank if no guest -->
|guest2 = <!-- leave blank if no second guest -->
|guest2         =                           <!-- leave blank if no second guest -->
|guest3 = <!-- leave blank if no third guest -->
|guest3         =                           <!-- leave blank if no third guest -->
|qowText = Quote
|downloadLink  = http://media.libsyn.com/media/skepticsguide/skepticast2006-07-05.mp3
|qowAuthor = Author <!-- use a {{w|wikilink}} or use <ref name=author>[url publication: title]</ref>, description
|forumLink     =  
 
(Use a first reference to an article attached to the quote. The second article reference is in the QoW section. See Episode 762 for an example.) -->

 
|downloadLink = {{DownloadLink|2006-07-05}}
|forumLink =  https://sguforums.org/index.php?board=1.0 <!-- try to find the right ?TOPIC= link for each episode -->
|}}
|}}
<!--
Note that you can put the Rogue's infobox initials inside triple quotes to make the initials bold in the transcript.


 
This is how the final statement from Steve is typed at the end of this transcript: '''S:''' —and until next week, this is your {{SGU}}.
-->
== Introduction ==
== Introduction ==
''You're listening to the Skeptics' Guide to the Universe, your escape to reality.''
''You're listening to the Skeptics' Guide to the Universe, your escape to reality.''
Line 69: Line 102:
J: Aboslutely.
J: Aboslutely.


== News Items <small>()</small> ==
== News Items ==
 
'''S:'''
 
'''B:'''
 
'''C:'''
 
'''J:'''
 
'''E:'''
<!-- ** the triple quotes are how you get the initials to be bolded. Remember to use double quotes with parentheses for non-speech sounds like (laughter) and (applause). It's a good practice to use brackets for comments like [inaudible] and [sarcasm]. -->  


=== Second hand smoke warning <small>()</small> ===
''(laughs)''
* Surgeon General, Richard Carmona, warns against second hand smoke<br/>http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/library/secondhandsmoke/report/<br/><br/>Another article on second-hand smoke:<br/>http://www.webmd.com/content/article/64/72529.htm<br/>
''(laughter)''
== Questions and E-mails <small>()</small> ==
''(applause)''
[inaudible]
=== Secondhand smoke warning <small>(1:50)</small> ===
*[https://web.archive.org/web/20071226110708/http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/library/secondhandsmoke/report/  Surgeon General, Richard Carmona, warns against second hand smoke]<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20071226110708/http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/library/secondhandsmoke/report/ Office of the Surgeon General: The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke: A Report of the Surgeon General]</ref>
<br/><br/>Another article on second-hand smoke:<br/>[http://www.webmd.com/content/article/64/72529.htm Secondhand Smoke Study Raises Ire]<ref>[http://www.webmd.com/content/article/64/72529.htm WebMD: Secondhand Smoke Study Raises Ire]</ref>


=== Binaural beats <small>()</small> ===
== Questions/Emails/Corrections/Follow-ups <small>()</small> ==
<blockquote>Dear Skeptics,<br/><br/>As I am working my way through your podcasts, if you have covered this I<br/>apologize.<br/><br/>Clearly, I have forgotten my critical thinking courses I took in college.<br/><br/>There is a subject called; Binaural beats. Though it sounds wonderful...<br/>that is just it, it sounds wonderful.<br/><br/>Rather than try to describe and misrepresent it, I will defer to the<br/>plethora of info out there.<br/><br/>if you google it... There are a couple of other names for it too.<br/><br/>here are a couple of links<br/>web-us.com/thescience.htm<br/>www.pzizz.com<br/>www.centerpointe.com/<br/><br/>Christopher Lund<br/>United Social Agnostics<br/><br/></blockquote>


=== Aubrey de Grey <small>()</small> ===
=== Email #1: Binaural beats <small>()</small> ===
<blockquote>I have a suggestion for a topic. There is scientist by the name of Aubrey de Grey. His shtick is proclaiming that through the application of science we can extend human life by several thousand years. His ideas are an amalgam of nano-technology, molecular biology,<br/>biomechanics, etc. He seems like such a nut that it amazes me that anyone takes him seriously. And yet he seems to be routinely written up in popular magazines such as Technology Review (MIT), and Fortune.<br/><br/>I do not know whether you would call what he preaches pseudo-science; he is different from your run of the mill crack-pot. But his ideas are so out there that he seems nuts. Any yet as I mentioned he gets a lot of popular press.<br/><br/>Anyway I enjoy your podcast and I think the ideas discussed are quite valuable.<br/><br/>Regards<br/>Mike Fattori<br/><br/>Review articles:<br/>www.technologyreview.com/sens/<br/><br/></blockquote>
<blockquote><p style="line-height:115%">Dear Skeptics,<br/><br/>As I am working my way through your podcasts, if you have covered this I<br/>apologize.<br/><br/>Clearly, I have forgotten my critical thinking courses I took in college.<br/><br/>There is a subject called; Binaural beats. Though it sounds wonderful...<br/>that is just it, it sounds wonderful.<br/><br/>Rather than try to describe and misrepresent it, I will defer to the<br/>plethora of info out there.<br/><br/>if you google it... There are a couple of other names for it too.<br/><br/>here are a couple of links<br/>web-us.com/thescience.htm<br/>www.pzizz.com<br/>www.centerpointe.com/<br/><br/>– Christopher Lund<br/>United Social Agnostics<br/><br/></p></blockquote>


=== Email #2: Aubrey de Grey <small>()</small> ===
<blockquote><p style="line-height:115%">I have a suggestion for a topic. There is scientist by the name of Aubrey de Grey. His shtick is proclaiming that through the application of science we can extend human life by several thousand years. His ideas are an amalgam of nano-technology, molecular biology,<br/>biomechanics, etc. He seems like such a nut that it amazes me that anyone takes him seriously. And yet he seems to be routinely written up in popular magazines such as Technology Review (MIT), and Fortune.<br/><br/>I do not know whether you would call what he preaches pseudo-science; he is different from your run of the mill crack-pot. But his ideas are so out there that he seems nuts. Any yet as I mentioned he gets a lot of popular press.<br/><br/>Anyway I enjoy your podcast and I think the ideas discussed are quite valuable.<br/><br/>– Regards<br/>Mike Fattori<br/><br/>Review articles:<br/>www.technologyreview.com/sens/<br/><br/></p></blockquote>
{{anchor|interview}} <!-- leave this anchor directly above the corresponding section that follows -->
== Interview with Gerald Posner <small>()</small> ==
== Interview with Gerald Posner <small>()</small> ==
{{Page categories
|Interview = y <!--
search for NAME interview: TOPIC (nnnn) to create a redirect page then edit that page with:
#REDIRECT
[[SGU_Episode_NNNN#interview]]
[[Category:Interview]]
Once redirects have been created, please hide the non-blank text used, which had placed the whole episode within the same category as the specific redirect.
We suggest typing "redirect(s) created for" in front of the text you hide in the markup. -->
}}
* Investigative journalist and author, Gerald Posner, has written some of the definitive histories of recent epic events in American history. Posner was educated at the University of California at Berkeley (1975) and Hastings Law School (1978).<br/><br/>His books include:<br/><br/>Case Closed: Lee Harvey Oswald and the Assassination of JFK (1993)<br/><br/>Killing the Dream: James Earl Ray and the Assassination of Martin Luther King Jr. (1998)<br/>www.cnn.com/books/beginnings/9804/killing.the.dream/<br/><br/>Why America Slept: the Failure to Prevent 9/11 (2003)<br/>www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/9/4/03534.shtml<br/>hnn.us/articles/1680.html<br/><br/>Secrets of the Kingdom: The Inside Story of the Saudi-U.S. Connection (2005)<br/><br/>www.posner.com/home.html
* Investigative journalist and author, Gerald Posner, has written some of the definitive histories of recent epic events in American history. Posner was educated at the University of California at Berkeley (1975) and Hastings Law School (1978).<br/><br/>His books include:<br/><br/>Case Closed: Lee Harvey Oswald and the Assassination of JFK (1993)<br/><br/>Killing the Dream: James Earl Ray and the Assassination of Martin Luther King Jr. (1998)<br/>www.cnn.com/books/beginnings/9804/killing.the.dream/<br/><br/>Why America Slept: the Failure to Prevent 9/11 (2003)<br/>www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/9/4/03534.shtml<br/>hnn.us/articles/1680.html<br/><br/>Secrets of the Kingdom: The Inside Story of the Saudi-U.S. Connection (2005)<br/><br/>www.posner.com/home.html
== Science or Fiction <small>()</small> ==
== Science or Fiction <small>()</small> ==
Question #1: New study shows that wearing a hat or helmet lined with aluminum foil reduces the frequency of seizures in certain epileptics.  
{{SOFResults
Question #2: New study shows a link between gum disease and carotid atheromas (a significant risk for stroke).
|fiction = <!-- short word or phrase representing the item -->
Question #3: Man recovers from 19 year coma with evidence of brain repair and regrowth.
|fiction2 = <!-- leave blank if absent; rarely does a host need to amend a "science" item -->
 
|science1 = <!-- short word or phrase representing the item -->
|science2 = <!-- leave blank if absent -->
|science3 = <!-- leave blank if absent -->
 
|rogue1 = <!-- rogues in order of response -->
|answer1 = <!-- item guessed, using word or phrase from above -->
 
|rogue2 =
|answer2 =
 
|rogue3 =
|answer3 =
 
|rogue4 = <!-- leave blank if absent -->
|answer4 = <!-- leave blank if absent -->
 
|rogue5 = <!-- leave blank if absent -->
|answer5 = <!-- leave blank if absent -->
 
|host = <!-- asker of the questions -->
<!-- for the result options below,
    only put a 'y' next to one. -->
|sweep = <!-- all the Rogues guessed wrong -->
|clever = <!-- each item was guessed (Steve's preferred result) -->
|win = <!-- at least one Rogue guessed wrong, but not them all -->
|swept = <!-- all the Rogues guessed right -->
}}
{{anchor|theme}}
''Voice-over: It's time for Science or Fiction.''
{{Page categories
|SoF with a Theme = <!--
 
search for "THEME (nnnn)" to create a redirect page, then edit that page with:
 
#REDIRECT
[[SGU_Episode_NNNN#theme]]    -- you can instead use #insert_specific_SOF_section_address_here if you want to redirect to the section header instead of the theme anchor
[[Category:SoF with a Theme]]
 
Once redirects have been created, please hide the non-blank text used, which had placed the whole episode within the same category as the specific redirect.
 
We suggest typing "redirect(s) created for" in front of the text you hide in the markup.-->
}}
{{SOFinfo
|theme = <!-- delete or leave blank if no theme -->
 
|item1 = New study shows that wearing a hat or helmet lined with aluminum foil reduces the frequency of seizures in certain epileptics.  
 
|link1 = <ref>[url_from_SoF_show_notes PUBLICATION: TITLE]</ref>
 
|item2 = New study shows a link between gum disease and carotid atheromas (a significant risk for stroke).
 
|link2 = <ref>[url_from_SoF_show_notes PUBLICATION: TITLE]</ref>
 
|item3 = Man recovers from 19 year coma with evidence of brain repair and regrowth.
|link3 = <ref>[url_from_SoF_show_notes PUBLICATION: TITLE]</ref>
 
|}}
 
=== _Rogue_ Response ===
 
=== _Rogue_ Response ===
 
=== _Rogue_ Response ===
 
=== _Rogue_ Response ===
 
=== _Host_ Explains Item #_n_ ===
 
=== _Host_ Explains Item #_n_ ===
 
=== _Host_ Explains Item #_n_ ===
 
== Skeptical Puzzle <small>()</small> ==
== Skeptical Puzzle <small>()</small> ==
<blockquote>Last Week's puzzle:<br/><br/>In the old game show, Let's Make A Deal, contestants were asked to pick which of three doors they thought contained a valuable prize. Once the contestant picked a door, the host, Monty Hall, would often open one of the two doors not chosen and then ask the contestant if they would like to change their pick to the other door left unopened. The question is, should a contestant stick with their original choice, change to the other door, or there is no difference statistically?<br/><br/>Answer: The contestant should change her pick to the other door. If she sticks with her first pick her chances of winning is 1/3, if she changes her pick her chances of winning is 2/3.<br/><br/><br/>New Puzzle:<br/><br/>Name the medical pseudoscience that, although now thoroughly disproved and rejected by mainstream science, at its inception was on the correct side of a major scientific debate of the time.</blockquote>
<blockquote>Last Week's puzzle:<br/><br/>In the old game show, Let's Make A Deal, contestants were asked to pick which of three doors they thought contained a valuable prize. Once the contestant picked a door, the host, Monty Hall, would often open one of the two doors not chosen and then ask the contestant if they would like to change their pick to the other door left unopened. The question is, should a contestant stick with their original choice, change to the other door, or there is no difference statistically?<br/><br/>Answer: The contestant should change her pick to the other door. If she sticks with her first pick her chances of winning is 1/3, if she changes her pick her chances of winning is 2/3.<br/><br/><br/>New Puzzle:<br/><br/>Name the medical pseudoscience that, although now thoroughly disproved and rejected by mainstream science, at its inception was on the correct side of a major scientific debate of the time.</blockquote>
== Skeptical Quote of the Week <small>()</small> ==
<!-- ** For the quote display, use block quote with no marks around quote followed by a long dash and the speaker's name, possibly with a reference. For the QoW that's read aloud, use quotation marks for when the Rogue actually reads the quote.
<p style="line-height:125%"> _consider_using_reduced_spacing_for_longer_quotes </p> -->
<blockquote>TEXT<br>– AUTHOR (YYYY-YYYY)<!-- <ref name=author/>[** this is a second reference to an article attached to quote in the infobox] … don’t use if you just need a {{w|wikilink}} -->, _short_description_ </blockquote>
== Signoff/Announcements <small>()</small> ==
<!-- ** if the signoff/announcements don't immediately follow the QoW or if the QoW comments take a few minutes, it would be appropriate to include a timestamp for when this part starts -->
'''S:''' —and until next week, this is your {{SGU}}. <!-- typically this is the last thing before the Outro -->
<!-- ** and if ending from a live recording, add
''(applause)''
-->


{{Outro39}}  
{{Outro39}}  
== Today I Learned ==
* Fact/Description, possibly with an article reference<ref>[url_for_TIL publication: title]</ref> <!-- add this format to include a referenced article, maintaining spaces: <ref>[URL publication: title]</ref> -->
* Fact/Description
* Fact/Description
== Notes ==
<references group=note/> <!--
** To create a note, type <ref group=note> then add the TEXT, LINK, etc. </ref> after the relevant text, or after the punctuation mark if the text to be noted is at the end of a sentence. -->
== References ==
== References ==
<references/>
<references/>
=== Vocabulary ===
<references group=v/> <!--
** To tag a vocab word in your transcription, type <ref group=v>[https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/WORD Wiktionary: WORD]</ref> after the word, or after the punctuation mark if the vocab word is the last word in a sentence. -->
{{Navigation}} <!-- inserts images that link to the previous and next episode pages -->
{{Page categories <!-- it helps to write a short description with the (episode number) which can then be used to search for the [Short description (nnnn)]s to create pages for redirects. Also, once redirects have been created, please hide the non-blank text used to place the whole episode within the same category as the redirect in the markup.
We suggest typing "redirect(s) created for" in front of the text you hide in the markup. -->
|Guest Rogues = <!-- search for NAME (nnnn) to create a redirect page -->
<!-- also note, not all guests are guest rogues; interviewees who don't feature beyond the interview are just guests -->
|Live Recording = <!-- search for TITLE (nnnn) to create a redirect page,
then edit that page with:
#REDIRECT
[[SGU_Episode_nnnn]]
[[Category:Live Recording]] -->
|Alternative Medicine =
|Astronomy & Space Science =
|Cons, Scams & Hoaxes =
|Conspiracy Theories =
|Creationism & ID =
|Cryptozoology =
|Energy Healing =
|Entertainment =
|ESP =
|General Science =
|Ghosts & Demons =
|History =
|Homeopathy =
|Humor =
|Legal Issues & Regulations =
|Logic & Philosophy =
|Myths & Misconceptions =
|Nature & Evolution =
|Neuroscience & Psychology =
|New Age =
|Paranormal =
|Physics & Mechanics =
|Politics =
|Prophecy =
|Pseudoscience =
|Religion & Faith =
|Science & Education =
|Science & Medicine =
|Science & the Media =
|SGU =
|Technology =
|UFOs & Aliens =


{{Navigation}} <!-- inserts images that link to the previous and next episode pages -->
|Amendments =
|Forgotten Superheroes of Science =
|This Day in Skepticism =
|Women in History =
|Skeptical Puzzle = y
}}

Revision as of 19:23, 15 February 2022

  Emblem-pen-green.png This transcript is not finished. Please help us finish it!
Add a Transcribing template to the top of this transcript before you start so that we don't duplicate your efforts.

Template:Editing required (w/links) This is an outline for a typical episode's transcription. Not all of these segments feature in each episode.
There may also be additional/special segments not listed in this outline.

You can use this outline to help structure the transcription. Click "Edit" above to begin.


SGU Episode 50
July 5th 2006
Posner2.jpg
(brief caption for the episode icon)

SGU 49                      SGU 51

Skeptical Rogues
S: Steven Novella

B: Bob Novella

J: Jay Novella

E: Evan Bernstein

P: Perry DeAngelis

Quote of the Week

Quote

Author 


Links
Download Podcast
Show Notes
Forum Discussion

Introduction

You're listening to the Skeptics' Guide to the Universe, your escape to reality.

S: Hello and welcome to the Skeptics' Guide to the Universe. Today is Wednesday, July 5th 2006. This is your host, Steven Novella, president of the New England Skeptical Society. Joining me this evening are...Bob Novella.

B: Good evening everyone.

S: ... Even Bernstein ...

E: Hello to my friends on planet Earth.

S: ... Perry DeAngelis ...

P: Good evening.

S: ... and Jay Novella ...

J: Hey guys, good to be here.

S: We have an all-testosterone show this week, which is the first time in quite a wile actually.

J: All-male-review.

S: Since Rebecca joined the crew. Rebecca is in Europe this week... and we couldn't get her onto the show from Europe, although she's actually going to be in Europe next week but promised she will try to get on the show next week so we will see. She says she can get access to the internet in England but not where she is now, where I think is in France.

P: We technically can barely get her on from Boston.

S: (laughs) That's true.

P: Be interesting to see if we can get her from Europe.

S: So it shouldn't really matter.

B: So this is our fiftieth podcast.

S: Yes. It is a bit of a milestone, this is number fifty, big five-oh. It seems like only a year ago we started doing this.

E: (laughs) At least, and thank you all of the listeners who have helped make this podcast very successful today.

J: Aboslutely.

News Items

S:

B:

C:

J:

E:

(laughs) (laughter) (applause) [inaudible]

Secondhand smoke warning (1:50)



Another article on second-hand smoke:
Secondhand Smoke Study Raises Ire[2]

Questions/Emails/Corrections/Follow-ups ()

Email #1: Binaural beats ()

Dear Skeptics,

As I am working my way through your podcasts, if you have covered this I
apologize.

Clearly, I have forgotten my critical thinking courses I took in college.

There is a subject called; Binaural beats. Though it sounds wonderful...
that is just it, it sounds wonderful.

Rather than try to describe and misrepresent it, I will defer to the
plethora of info out there.

if you google it... There are a couple of other names for it too.

here are a couple of links
web-us.com/thescience.htm
www.pzizz.com
www.centerpointe.com/

– Christopher Lund
United Social Agnostics

Email #2: Aubrey de Grey ()

I have a suggestion for a topic. There is scientist by the name of Aubrey de Grey. His shtick is proclaiming that through the application of science we can extend human life by several thousand years. His ideas are an amalgam of nano-technology, molecular biology,
biomechanics, etc. He seems like such a nut that it amazes me that anyone takes him seriously. And yet he seems to be routinely written up in popular magazines such as Technology Review (MIT), and Fortune.

I do not know whether you would call what he preaches pseudo-science; he is different from your run of the mill crack-pot. But his ideas are so out there that he seems nuts. Any yet as I mentioned he gets a lot of popular press.

Anyway I enjoy your podcast and I think the ideas discussed are quite valuable.

– Regards
Mike Fattori

Review articles:
www.technologyreview.com/sens/

Interview with Gerald Posner ()

  • Investigative journalist and author, Gerald Posner, has written some of the definitive histories of recent epic events in American history. Posner was educated at the University of California at Berkeley (1975) and Hastings Law School (1978).

    His books include:

    Case Closed: Lee Harvey Oswald and the Assassination of JFK (1993)

    Killing the Dream: James Earl Ray and the Assassination of Martin Luther King Jr. (1998)
    www.cnn.com/books/beginnings/9804/killing.the.dream/

    Why America Slept: the Failure to Prevent 9/11 (2003)
    www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/9/4/03534.shtml
    hnn.us/articles/1680.html

    Secrets of the Kingdom: The Inside Story of the Saudi-U.S. Connection (2005)

    www.posner.com/home.html

Science or Fiction ()

Answer Item
Fiction
Science
Host Result
'
Rogue Guess

Voice-over: It's time for Science or Fiction.

Item #1: New study shows that wearing a hat or helmet lined with aluminum foil reduces the frequency of seizures in certain epileptics.[3]
Item #2: New study shows a link between gum disease and carotid atheromas (a significant risk for stroke).[4]
Item #3: Man recovers from 19 year coma with evidence of brain repair and regrowth.[5]


_Rogue_ Response

_Rogue_ Response

_Rogue_ Response

_Rogue_ Response

_Host_ Explains Item #_n_

_Host_ Explains Item #_n_

_Host_ Explains Item #_n_

Skeptical Puzzle ()

Last Week's puzzle:

In the old game show, Let's Make A Deal, contestants were asked to pick which of three doors they thought contained a valuable prize. Once the contestant picked a door, the host, Monty Hall, would often open one of the two doors not chosen and then ask the contestant if they would like to change their pick to the other door left unopened. The question is, should a contestant stick with their original choice, change to the other door, or there is no difference statistically?

Answer: The contestant should change her pick to the other door. If she sticks with her first pick her chances of winning is 1/3, if she changes her pick her chances of winning is 2/3.


New Puzzle:

Name the medical pseudoscience that, although now thoroughly disproved and rejected by mainstream science, at its inception was on the correct side of a major scientific debate of the time.

Skeptical Quote of the Week ()

TEXT
– AUTHOR (YYYY-YYYY), _short_description_

Signoff/Announcements ()

S: —and until next week, this is your Skeptics' Guide to the Universe.

S: The Skeptics' Guide to the Universe is produced by the New England Skeptical Society. For information on this and other podcasts, please visit our website at www.theskepticsguide.org. Please send us your questions, suggestions, and other feedback; you can use the "Contact Us" page on our website, or you can send us an email to info@theskepticsguide.org. 'Theorem' is produced by Kineto and is used with permission.

Today I Learned

  • Fact/Description, possibly with an article reference[6]
  • Fact/Description
  • Fact/Description

Notes

References

  1. Office of the Surgeon General: The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke: A Report of the Surgeon General
  2. WebMD: Secondhand Smoke Study Raises Ire
  3. [url_from_SoF_show_notes PUBLICATION: TITLE]
  4. [url_from_SoF_show_notes PUBLICATION: TITLE]
  5. [url_from_SoF_show_notes PUBLICATION: TITLE]
  6. [url_for_TIL publication: title]

Vocabulary


Navi-previous.png Back to top of page Navi-next.png