SGU Episode 762: Difference between revisions
m (→Venice Floods, Québec Accords (3:10): added nuke decom link) |
|||
Line 360: | Line 360: | ||
'''E:''' About time. | '''E:''' About time. | ||
'''S:''' But they only have a few years before the older plants really, seriously need to be decommissioned. That’s a looming disaster, by the way. | '''S:''' But they only have a few years before the older plants really, seriously need to be {{w|Nuclear decommissioning|decommissioned}}. That’s a looming disaster, by the way. | ||
'''B:''' Yeah, but when the {{w|Fusion power|fusion plants}} come online, we’ll be in good shape. | '''B:''' Yeah, but when the {{w|Fusion power|fusion plants}} come online, we’ll be in good shape. |
Revision as of 17:30, 26 April 2020
This episode is in the middle of being transcribed by xanderox (talk) as of 2020-04-26. To help avoid duplication, please do not transcribe this episode while this message is displayed. |
This episode needs: transcription, proofreading, time stamps, formatting, links, 'Today I Learned' list, categories, segment redirects. Please help out by contributing! |
How to Contribute |
SGU Episode 762 |
---|
Dec 6th 2035 😉 |
(brief caption for the episode icon) |
Skeptical Rogues |
S: Steven Novella |
B: Bob Novella |
C: Cara Santa Maria |
J: Jay Novella |
E: Evan Bernstein |
Quote of the Week |
'Science is the greatest thing known to humans. Through science we have been able to seize a modicum of control over the otherwise natural state of chaos among the cosmos. It is truly the most stunning achievement for a lifeform that has emerged from the dust of the stars. In order for us to be the best stewards of our universe, we must continue the pursuit of science, and may it forever be our torch to light our way forward' |
Alyssa Carson[1], first resident of Armstrong Station, The Moon |
Links |
Download Podcast |
Show Notes |
Forum Discussion |
Introduction
You're listening to the Skeptics' Guide to the Universe, your escape to reality.
S: Hello and welcome to the Skeptics' Guide to the Universe. (applause) Today is Thursday, December 6th, 2035, and this is your host, Steven Novella. (audience laughter) Joining me this week are Bob Novella ...
B: Hey, everybody! (applause)
S: Cara Santa Maria...
C: Howdy. (applause)
S: Jay Novella ...
J: Hey guys. (applause)
S: And Evan Bernstein ...
E: Good evening folks! (applause)
S: So I have to say it's great to be back in Melbourne, but I am –
B: Wait, why did you laugh? Why was that funny? (laughter) We worked for months to get this pronunciation correct. What happened?
S: There's no right or wrong. There's no right or wrong.
J: As recent as today, somebody sent us an email that explained how to say it, yet again. (laughter) They said, "drop all the vowels."
S: Right. But then they yell at us because there's a difference between saying it properly and saying it with an accent.
J: Yeah.
S: And we're supposed to say it properly for an American.
C: Yeah, without an (inaudible).
S: And I have no idea where in the spectrum of "Mel-born" to "Mel-burn" to "Mel-bin"…
E: Yeah, just don't say, "Mel-born." You're safe.
S: So it's great to be here, but I have to say I'm getting a little old for the 14-hour flights across the Pacific. You know, it was just a couple years ago that they brought back the supersonic commercial airliners, like 2031, I think it was, but they are just still too expensive for schlubs like us.
C: I've done 'em before, though. They're worth it, you guys.
S: Oh, sure.
C: I keep trying to convince you.
B: Of course you've done it. And probably first class (inaudible).
S: What is it, about six hours across the…?
C: Yeah, it's so much easier. It's like flying – it's like it used to be when I'd fly from L.A. to New York.
J: And you don't hear the sonic boom anymore. They got rid of it.
C: Yeah, yeah, it's super comfy. Just fall asleep, wake up, I'm there.
B: But, Jay, that big breakthrough that allowed the supersonic transport to become viable again was the fact that they design the shape – you've seen the shape, it's a gorgeous, really elongated shape – but that minimizes the sonic boom by like a 1000th of what it used to be. And that's what was the big problem with it. Remember, what was it, the old one, the Concorde …
S: And when did we first talk about that? It was, like, 15 years ago.
B: Oh my god.
E: Long time ago.
S: And here we are, like just coming (inaudible).
B: Remember? I saw it. I think I saw it in a magazine the first time we were in this area. And I said, "Look at this. This is something that's really going to be big in the future. And it was.
J: It is.
C: It is.
E: You were right, Bob.
C: Tense-shifting is hard from, like, the U.S. to Australia.
S: Yeah, yeah, yeah.
C: Time-traveling a little bit here. (winks?)
News Items
S: So, it's 2035, so this is our 30th Anniversary year of doing the SGU and because of that, we're finishing up 30 years. We're going to talk about regular news items, but we're going to give more of a history, like, where does this fit into the arc of science and skepticism over the last 30 years of the SGU, right?
Venice Floods, Québec Accords (3:10)
S: So, Jay's going to start with a news item that has something to do with global warming. He didn't tell me what it is, but you're going to start by telling us where we've been, where we're going, where are we in this saga that we've been talking about, it seems like, for 30 years.
J: Well, yeah, I mean when we first started talking about this, I don't even know when we first started talking about this –
S: I think right at the beginning, 2005, 2006.
J: It was a mounting thing that, as the years went by, we started to talk more and more about it. And then somewhere around the late 2020s, we really started to talk about, almost on every episode, to the point where listeners were emailing us, saying, "Okay, we get it. Global warming is bad news.
But we've seen a lot of bad things happen over the last 10 to 15 years where local governments, or governments in general are doing absolutely nothing. They still can't get out of their own way, right? We know that, but nothing has really been happening. And then in 2027, when Venice got so flooded that it couldn't recover, that's when the world woke up.
C: That was so sad. I miss Venice. (laughter)
S: And you can't even visit Venice anymore, right?
J: I mean, sure, you can, but there's only certain parts that you can go to.
C: It's too dangerous, guys.
B: But why didn't they try to just to build up, like abandon the bottom five (inaudible).
C: They tried that.
E: Too cost-prohibitive, among other things.
C: The foundation can't hold it.
J: The foundations weren't capable of holding it. So—
S: They would just sink back down.
J: It really hit a note across the globe when a lot of the art got destroyed. So that's when everybody—that's when I think we can kind of look back, as a marker, like the whole world took a pause.
So then in 2027, that same year, we had the Québec Accord, which was an absolute failure. I think Canada's heart was in the right place, but they tried to inspire the world to change. But governments just can't get out of their own way.
S: But think about it. Think about the Paris Accord, right, when was that? That was, like, 2015.
E: 2015.
S: Yeah, 2015. They said, "Okay, we're going to limit post-industrial warming to 2.0C above pre-industrial levels." And even though they knew that bad shit was going to happen at 2.0, really we needed to keep it beneath 1.5, which we hit this year, guys. This year we had 1.5C above pre-industrial level, 2035. So they didn't even try to ever get 1.5. They're like, "Alright, let's just keep it below 2." And they failed to do that. What they agreed to wouldn't even accomplish that.
J: Yeah, there was no chance of them getting that.
S: And the Québec Accords, they're like, "Alright, well, let's, maybe 3.0. Let's just keep it 3ºC above…
E: Move the goalposts.
S: And then, they, again, "We're not going to achieve that. We're all …
C: Well, and it's because they're not giving themselves any sort of—it's like a treaty. It's like, "Oh, we'll just agree to all do this."
E: It's a pledge.
C: It's a pledge. They're not even giving—
S: There's no consequences.
C: There's no consequences for not sticking to it.
J: Well, that's the problem because it's the real first global problem.
E: People, countries can exit as they wish.
C: I mean, remember back when Trump just dropped the ball on it? He just left. He just said, "No, Paris." I mean, we've been trying to make up for that ever since.
E: Gone.
S: Maybe Rubio will do the same thing.
J: Yeah.
C: Ugh. President Rubio.
E: President Rubio.
J: So, the things that we've seen—it wasn't just what happened in Venice but, you know, the storms continued to become deadly, right? So we have people dying every time there's a storm, a big storm.
S: Seems like every hurricane's a CAT-5 now.
C: Oh, and my city is constantly on fire. LA, also Sydney, even Melbourne. It's on fire all the time now.
S: Yeah, basically it's always fires.
B: Remember when—
C: Yeah, we used to have a fire season.
B: Yeah, remember fire season. Wasn't that quaint?
C: Now it's a red flag day every day.
J: But the reason why we're reviewing this is because, as you guys know, a few years ago, in 2032, IKEA, of all companies, drew a line in the sand and said that corporations have to now take the responsibility. And I love the tagline. What's the tagline?
S: "We got it."
J: "We got this."
All: "We got this."
C: IKEA! They got this.
S: But I don't think it's (plainly) "We got this." I think it's (assuringly confident) "We got this."
C: (laughs)
S: I think it's like, "Yeah, you guys failed. You're hopeless. You're in total political gridlock. So, somebody's got to step in. So we got this. Go away. We'll (inaudible).
B: So you're referring to governments in general, right?
S: Yeah, governments.
E: Right.
J: And it's—
B: That was a great tagline.
S: Yeah, but, you know, I'm worried about it.
J: It is a dystopian future, though, when corporations have to save us from government.
C: It's a dystopian present.
S: But, literally, I remember back in 2018, I think it was, there was a very short-lived science fiction series on some channel, some cable channel, where that's exactly what happened, [which] is that corporations had to step in because the governments were in gridlock. And then they used that in order to get—they didn't take over from the governments, governments just ceded them more and more power until they were de facto in charge, which is what a lot of people are worried about—like the conspiracy theorists, but it's actually not unreasonable—that that's the ultimate plan of the—what are they calling it? The Global Corporate Initiative.
J: Right.
C: GC—
E: GCI.
S: Yeah, their plan is not just to fix global warming for the world but to actually take power, to seize power.
J: So it didn't really—it almost started off as a joke, but then, just recently, in the news article that I'm covering, we've actually hit a critical mass. There's a lot of companies that just signed on that agreed that they're going to follow it. Now, here are the basic rules, or whatever, that they're following. So they're saying that they will have a zero-carbon emission or less, meaning that they could actually pay in to even reduce carbon emissions, so the company cannot produce any carbon whatsoever. So—
C: Oh, so they get credits if they go negative, carbon negative?
J: Well, actually, the companies are committing to the Alliance or saying that if do, that they have to pay massive fines to the—
S: Well can’t they just buy the credit from people who are negative?
J: Yeah, yeah.
S: So they have to be neutral—
J: They have to be neutral, whether it’s done through finances or through their—
S: So it’s like the old cap-and-trade thing, but they’re just doing it—
B: But what’s the motivation for them to actually join this? Why are they joining—what’s the win for them? I mean, this is going cause some—they may have to pay fines if they don’t—
C: Haven’t you seen all of those social media boycotts of all the companies that are just eating carbon? I think young people today, they don’t want to buy products, they don’t want to engage with companies that are just destroying the environment. They’re a lot hipper than we were when we were young.
B: I don’t go on the young people’s social media, so I don’t know what the hell they’re talking about.
C: We’re all the same platform, Bob.
J: No, but Cara, you’re right because the boycotting is actually part of the issue now. Is that any company—well there’s people—it goes both ways, there’s boycotting going both ways. So we have boycotts happening where companies that don’t join are being boycotted, which is—I’m kind of in that camp. But there are people that are saying if they do join, that these companies are trying to take power away from the government.
C: Great!
J: And people are boycotting them, saying that they’re going to be a part of the future problem.
C: True.
J: As typical—
S: You’re kind of screwed either way, right?
J: It’s a clusterfuck going both ways. It’s a little concerning because I would like to think that these companies have humanity’s best in mind.
C: Why would you ever think that?
S: Well, I mean it’s always complicated, alright? Companies sometimes do good things, right? And they get PR out of it, and then you say, “Okay, are they doing it because they really care about their customers, or do they really care about the planet?” They’re living on this planet, too, and some of their profits, actually—there are lots of companies who are losing profits because of climate change. So they’re invested in it as well, but then you have to wonder, are they just doing it for the PR, do they have an ulterior motive (inaudible)—
C: But also, does that matter?
S: That’s a good question, does it really matter?
J: It just depends on what the result is.
S: If you do the right thing for the wrong reason and it helps, is that—how much do you care about the motivation?
C: I mean, when it comes to climate change, I honestly don’t mind.
E: I think they’re also trying to prevent themselves from being handed down punishments by governments for not meeting certain criteria. So they’re kind of trying to stay one step ahead of that because that’s terrible for their PR.
C: They’re not going to get any punishment. The governments are in the pocket of lobbyists anyway.
S: But if they do get off their ass and actually do something, it’s probably going to be shortsighted and draconian, and the companies are afraid of what might happen if some other populist takes control. Who knows—politics now are so—we thought they bad, 2016 to 2020. They’re even worse.
J: And the trillionaires are doing nothing. We have—
S: Well, some of them are signing onto this accord.
E: Some of them are.
J: So what, though? They’re signing on, but that—they’re the trillionaires. They have the money. They could be throwing down half their wealth but that hasn’t happened yet.
S: That wouldn’t be enough.
B: Imagine $500 billion’s half your wealth.
E: (laughs) (inaudible)
B: Sorry.
(audience laughter)
J: Of course, there was an unspoken sentence in there, Bob. Something about Halloween, right?
B: No. It’s just that I don’t have $500 billion.
(laughter)
B: And I want it.
C: 2035 and SGU, we’re not making it. We’re just—we still got a long ways to go before—
E: Scratching that, scratching that—
C: Before we break even a million. Definitely not a billion.
J: So we’ll just have to wait and see. I feel like what do we have to lose? No other government—I mean, Denver—I’m sorry, Colorado and California, these are local governments, but they’re kind of signing on now, too, and they’re starting to pressure the companies that are—
S: But they’ve been doing that for years. And here’s the thing: if you look at—like recently I saw over the last thirty years—as I was looking in preparation for this—last thirty years, what has been the energy mix of the world’s energy infrastructure? Right, you’ve seen this chart. I sent this out. So, if you look at all the fossil fuels, they were increasing up until around 2025? And then they leveled off. Coal has decreased a little bit, but it’s overtaken by natural gas. But, overall, fossil fuel has been about level; it’s not decreasing, even now! What’s happening—
E: It’s population.
C: Because there’s so many more people now.
S: Right, it’s 8.8 billion people.
B: Its proportion has been decreasing.
S: Yeah, so there’s been an expansion of renewable, a little bit of nuclear—now that the Gen IV plants just coming online—
E: About time.
S: But they only have a few years before the older plants really, seriously need to be decommissioned. That’s a looming disaster, by the way.
B: Yeah, but when the fusion plants come online, we’ll be in good shape.
S: Yeah, right.
B: Come on.
S: We’re still 20 years away.
B: It’s real close.
S: We’re still 20 years away.
(audience laughter)
B: It’s not 20 years away; it’s 15 years away.
C: (laughs) Such an optimist.
S: So renewable’s increasing, nuclear’s kind of stable, maybe increasing a little bit, but that’s just taking up all the new expansion of total global energy.
B: Right, which is something.
S: But fossil fuels are flat! We’re not decreasing fossil fuels.
J: We’re maintaining the same carbon output.
S: Over the last—we’ve been talking about this for how long? We haven’t been able—
C: How long has it been? You guys are old now.
S: 30 years.
E: Hey!
C: (laughs)
E: Okay, spring chicken.
C: Hey, well, now…
B: Yeah, when’s your social security kicking in? Not too far away.
E: Yeah, right?
C: I got like a whole decade ahead of me at least.
J: Do you still have social security? (inaudible)
C: No, it’s completely insolvent.
S: Alright, so, now we have to wait for IKEA to save us, is that what you’re telling me?
C: No, the Global Corporate Alliance.
B: (sarcasm) That doesn’t sound evil.
J: “We got this.”
C: That does sound evil. (laughs)
S: How could that not be evil?
J: We’ll see what happens.
B: What else do they got?
Fourth Domain of Life (14:14)
S: Alright. Guys, let me ask you a question, especially Bob. How many domains of life are there?
Who's That Noisy? ()
Questions and Emails ()
Question 1 ()
Question 2 ()
Interview with "..." ()
Science or Fiction ()
Skeptical Quote of the Week ()
Science is the greatest thing known to humans. Through science we have been able to seize a modicum of control over the otherwise natural state of chaos among the cosmos. It is truly the most stunning achievement for a lifeform that has emerged from the dust of the stars. In order for us to be the best stewards of our universe, we must continue the pursuit of science, and may it forever be our torch to light our way forward. — Alyssa Carson[1], first resident of Armstrong Station, The Moon
Announcements ()
S: Skeptics' Guide to the Universe is produced by SGU Productions, dedicated to promoting science and critical thinking. For more information, visit us at theskepticsguide.org. Send your questions to info@theskepticsguide.org. And, if you would like to support the show and all the work that we do, go to patreon.com/SkepticsGuide and consider becoming a patron and becoming part of the SGU community. Our listeners and supporters are what make SGU possible.
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Alyssa Carson: Mars One. https://www.mars-one.com/about-mars-one/ambassadors/alyssa-carson