User talk:Av8rmike: Difference between revisions

From SGUTranscripts
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(thanks)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
:Oh hi! I refer back to the audio when I come across something in the transcript that doesn't make sense (especially proper names, etc.) but I only do it in small sections. I haven't been verifying the transcripts whole episodes at a time, if that's what you're asking.<br>--[[User:Av8rmike|Av8rmike]] ([[User talk:Av8rmike|talk]]) 17:56, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
:Oh hi! I refer back to the audio when I come across something in the transcript that doesn't make sense (especially proper names, etc.) but I only do it in small sections. I haven't been verifying the transcripts whole episodes at a time, if that's what you're asking.<br>--[[User:Av8rmike|Av8rmike]] ([[User talk:Av8rmike|talk]]) 17:56, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
::Ok, great. I'll categorise them under 'needs proof-reading'. We've not finalised how to go about this yet,  it's up to you if you want to make a note of what you've proof-read in the episode's talk page or something. Other suggestions are welcome :)<br>--[[User:Teleuteskitty|Teleuteskitty]] ([[User talk:Teleuteskitty|talk]]) 19:47, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
::Ok, great. I'll categorise them under 'needs proof-reading'. We've not finalised how to go about this yet,  it's up to you if you want to make a note of what you've proof-read in the episode's talk page or something. Other suggestions are welcome :)<br>--[[User:Teleuteskitty|Teleuteskitty]] ([[User talk:Teleuteskitty|talk]]) 19:47, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
Thank you so much for your tip! I'm quite the noob when it comes to html, so I appreciate the time you took to help me out! :)

Revision as of 11:55, 17 October 2012

Hi, I'm adding the 'editing required' template where needed, we're gonna try and get each page verified by someone other than the main author. I noticed you'd fixed some typos on episodes 350-355 and 357-358. Does this mean you've proof-read the whole episodes already? And if so, did you do it along with the audio, or based on the text? Thanks for the hard work, it's all coming together nicely.
--Teleuteskitty (talk) 17:09, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Oh hi! I refer back to the audio when I come across something in the transcript that doesn't make sense (especially proper names, etc.) but I only do it in small sections. I haven't been verifying the transcripts whole episodes at a time, if that's what you're asking.
--Av8rmike (talk) 17:56, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
Ok, great. I'll categorise them under 'needs proof-reading'. We've not finalised how to go about this yet, it's up to you if you want to make a note of what you've proof-read in the episode's talk page or something. Other suggestions are welcome :)
--Teleuteskitty (talk) 19:47, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Thank you so much for your tip! I'm quite the noob when it comes to html, so I appreciate the time you took to help me out! :)