SGU Episode 202: Difference between revisions

From SGUTranscripts
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(auto skel, show notes)
 
m (Reserving episode for transcription)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{transcribing all
|transcriber = Mantis!
|date        = 2015-02-22
}}
{{Editing required
{{Editing required
                                 |transcription          = y
                                 |transcription          = y

Revision as of 02:04, 23 February 2015

  Emblem-pen.png This episode is in the middle of being transcribed by Mantis! (talk) as of 2015-02-22.
To help avoid duplication, please do not transcribe this episode while this message is displayed.
  Emblem-pen-orange.png This episode needs: transcription, time stamps, formatting, links, 'Today I Learned' list, categories, segment redirects.
Please help out by contributing!
How to Contribute


SGU Episode 202
June 3rd 2009
Crystals.jpg
(brief caption for the episode icon)

SGU 201                      SGU 203

Skeptical Rogues
S: Steven Novella

B: Bob Novella

R: Rebecca Watson

J: Jay Novella

E: Evan Bernstein

Quote of the Week

'Some people try to tell me that science will never answer the big questions we have in life. To them I say: baloney! The real problem is your questions aren’t big enough.'

Phil Plait

Links
Download Podcast
Show Notes
SGU Forum


Introduction

You're listening to the Skeptics' Guide to the Universe, your escape to reality.

News Items ()

Newsweek vs Oprah ()

Volcanic Extinction ()

UFO News ()

Texas Evolution Update ()

Questions and E-mails ()

Question # 1 - Evangelical Skeptics ()

Greetings Skeptics! I have listened to and enjoyed every podcast you have put out (except for the infamous Neal Adams interview, which I just can't bring myself to cue up...I think being a huge fan of his comics work is preventing me, or the fact that I generally don't find such raw confrontations entertaining) My question stems from a recent conversation I had with my girlfriend who generally considers herself to be a critical thinker although she does have her 'sacred cow' like almost everyone does...in her case she is a non-practicing pagan. We listen to several podcasts together, but when I ask her to listen to yours she refuses, her reason being that she feels 'you have a tendency to be just as 'evangelical' and at times 'close-minded' as the believers'. I can think of quite a few ways to defend you in response to that comment, but I think hearing from you directly might have a greater impact. Whether you respond via email or on the show I'll make sure she reads/hears your answer. Thanks for your time and keep up the quality work! Shane Nitzsche (pronounced NIT-chee)

Question # 2 - Begging the Question ()

Okay. I give up. After all, with you guys as my role models (and in this case, Stephen) what choice do I have. I've been increasingly depressed at the way the term 'begging the question' has come, in mainstream media, to mean RAISING the question--and not what it always USED to mean. Now I have no problem with language evolving and meanings changing. However, 'begging the question' is such a valuable term for identifying a common logical fallacy--I seem always to be using it to harpoon some blubbering claim. And now? The term is becoming useless. And I know of no other to replace it. Circular argument is almost there, but, unless I'm mistaken, has a different emphasis. In fact, I was about to write to you lot looking for support, a crusade, a suggestion...something--when, what to my wondering ears should I hear.. but you, Stephen, using the term in the NEW, trendy, way, in the last podcast. Aaaarrrgh. I was hoping I could point out that, inconsistently, you have the term in your list of logical fallacies, but, alas, though it appears in virtually all such lists, it does not appear in yours. drat. So, I guess, I just give up. But that begs the question, 'What term do I use instead?' Theo Dombrowski Nanoose bay, British Columbia

Interview with Simon Singh ()

Science or Fiction ()

Item # 1: Neil Armstrong recently confirmed that his famous “one small step for man” phrase was written for him by a NASA press secretary. Item # 2: Scientists have been able to track emperor penguin colonies in Antarctica from space by using satellites to spot their droppings. Item # 3: Researchers find that space headache is a real and distinct phenomenon and call for it to have its own classification.

Who's That Noisy ()

  • Answer to last week: Brian Brushwood

Quote of the Week ()

'Some people try to tell me that science will never answer the big questions we have in life. To them I say: baloney! The real problem is your questions aren’t big enough.' - Phil Plait

S: The Skeptics' Guide to the Universe is produced by the New England Skeptical Society in association with the James Randi Educational Foundation and skepchick.org. For more information on this and other episodes, please visit our website at www.theskepticsguide.org. For questions, suggestions, and other feedback, please use the "Contact Us" form on the website, or send an email to info@theskepticsguide.org. If you enjoyed this episode, then please help us spread the word by voting for us on Digg, or leaving us a review on iTunes. You can find links to these sites and others through our homepage. 'Theorem' is produced by Kineto, and is used with permission.

References


Navi-previous.png Back to top of page Navi-next.png