Talk:SGU Episode 6: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:Gene, it's not strictly required, and it's usually more trouble than it's worth. I usually leave them out and just capture the intent of whatever is being said, but I do still include dashes (–) when someone is not using complete sentences. Of course, if someone is stumbling over pronunciation and it's being played up for humorous effect, you gotta include that. =) | :Gene, it's not strictly required, and it's usually more trouble than it's worth. I usually leave them out and just capture the intent of whatever is being said, but I do still include dashes (–) when someone is not using complete sentences. Of course, if someone is stumbling over pronunciation and it's being played up for humorous effect, you gotta include that. =) | ||
:-- [[User:Av8rmike|Av8rmike]] ([[User talk:Av8rmike|talk]]) 04:17, 16 October 2012 (UTC) | :-- [[User:Av8rmike|Av8rmike]] ([[User talk:Av8rmike|talk]]) 04:17, 16 October 2012 (UTC) | ||
::Oh, whoops, Didn't see your reply for a long while. I think you're approach is right, getting every "uh" doesn't make sense. I use "..." a lot for incomplete sentences.<br>--[[User:Geneocide|Geneocide]] ([[User talk:Geneocide|talk]]) 22:32, 18 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 09:32, 19 October 2012
Do you guys use these discussion pages? I was wondering what people thought about me including all the "ums" and "uhs" and stuff. I can't decide if it makes it better or not.
- Gene, it's not strictly required, and it's usually more trouble than it's worth. I usually leave them out and just capture the intent of whatever is being said, but I do still include dashes (–) when someone is not using complete sentences. Of course, if someone is stumbling over pronunciation and it's being played up for humorous effect, you gotta include that. =)
- -- Av8rmike (talk) 04:17, 16 October 2012 (UTC)